The following describes the functionality and features included in Probe Audit Premium+.
Instructions:
10.60 - OVERALL MATERIALITY ASSESSMENT
Objective
The objective of this document is to assist you in determining the following key concepts of the Probe Audit Premium+ Methodology:
• Overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole;
• Performance materiality to determine further risk assessment procedures; and
• An amount below which misstatements will be considered clearly trivial.
Document placement
Document 10.60 can be found in the Pre-engagement planning folder in the Caseware document manager.

Document content
This document is designed to be a worksheet type document with space for a comment or further description.
This document is divided into different bookmarks in the document map to assist you in determining the different materiality values. The bookmarks included are:
- Bases for materiality
- Reasons for basis
- Materiality
The firm author can tailor this document to the firm methodology in FIRMSETT Probe Firm Settings.
If the base applicable to the engagement is not available, a row can be added to the table to manually add the base, range of percentages and values for current and prior year.
Layout
COLUMN
|
INPUT REQUIRED
|
OUTCOME
|
Bases for materiality
|
Bases with the minimum and maximum percentage ranges
|
These bases have been set by the firm author, so no input is required in this column.
|
No impact on the engagement file.
|
Figures
|
Preliminary current year figures are reflected in the document. This can be edited, should there be a reason to do so, such as for known journal entries to a balance or if interim or budgeted figures are used to calculate materiality.
The final prior year figures are reflected. These can also be edited if necessary.
|
No impact on the engagement file.
|
Selection tick box
|
Select an appropriate base by clicking on the tick box. More than one tick box can be selected at the same time.
Selecting the tick box will automatically calculate the materiality range which reflected in the area below the table.
|
No impact on the engagement file.
|
Reasons for bases used
|
|
Based on the tick boxes selected for the bases you should document the judgement made for each selection.
Should there be other qualitative considerations these are also documented in this section of the document where prompted.
|
No impact on the engagement file.
|
Materiality figures
|
Overall materiality
|
Document the overall materiality chosen from the range displayed. Document the judgement made during this selection.
|
Overall materiality will be considered at the finalisation stage.
|
Performance materiality
|
Performance materiality is calculated as a percentage of overall materiality. The percentage applied is determined by the desired audit risk level as determined in 10.20 - Engagement evaluation.
|
Performance materiality is used in the consideration of specific materiality in 11.60 - Risk assessment at assertion level.
|
Clearly trivial amount
|
The amount below which misstatements are considered clearly trivial is calculated as either:
- a percentage of overall materiality; or
- based on a range.
The method for setting the clearly trivial amount is set in FIRMSETT - Probe Firm Settings.
|
Users will apply the clearly trivial amount to assess whether cumulative misstatements identified in the section should be accumulated with other uncorrected misstatements identified during the audit.
|
Document outcomes
You must determine the following values before you conclude on this document:
- Overall materiality
- Performance materiality and
- The amount below which misstatements are considered clearly trivial.
Group audits
There are no modifications to this document when the engagement type was selected as Group Audit Single or Group Audit Multiple
Features
The following features are available in the document:
- Insert or delete a row at the end, see page F5
- Guidance, see page F16
- Freeze, see page F17
Rate this article:
|vote=None|
Processing...
(Popularity = 0/100, Rating = 0.0/5)
Related Articles
Probe Audit | 10.60 Overall materiality assessment
Probe | Pre-Engagement Planning - 10.60 Overall materiality assessment
Probe Methodology | Pre-Engagement Planning - 10.60 Overall materiality assessment
Probe | Plan risk assessment procedures related to COTABDs and resources to be used
view all...
Search Results
Sending a Future Dated Request
Can I request for a future "As of Date"?
Can I request more information from the Responder (Bank)?
I can’t request authorisation from a client signer as the name is greyed out (cannot be selected)?
Probe | How do I fix the error “knowledge library not found” when inserting a step in the work program?
view all...